U.S. President Donald Trump recently mentioned the redeployment of nuclear submarines, sending a warning message to Russia. It is highly unusual for the President to officially mention the existence of submarines, considered one of the most covert and powerful means of delivering nuclear weapons, which is interpreted as a diplomatic signal beyond just strategic deterrence.

The U.S. nuclear-powered submarine USS Annapolis is anchored at a naval base on Jeju Island. /Courtesy of Reuters=Yonhap News

According to Fox News and others on June 6 (local time), President Trump stated during a Q&A session with reporters that "submarines have been deployed in areas where they should already be," although he did not disclose their specific locations but hinted at waters near Russia. This comment came shortly after Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council, hinted at the possibility of nuclear use. Medvedev raised the nuclear threat level by mentioning the Soviet-era nuclear retaliatory system, 'Dead Hand,' in relation to recent U.S. sanctions ultimatum against Russia.

Military experts analyzed President Trump's remarks as a strategic message rather than an actual projection of military power. Mike Connor, a former commander of U.S. Navy submarines, said, "The adversaries already know that U.S. submarines exist, but the mere reminder from the President can have a deterrent effect." He assessed, "Trump did not reveal any new information, and since the location of the nuclear submarines has not been disclosed, strategic ambiguity remains intact."

Gene Morando, a former U.S. Navy strategic advisor, noted, "The deployment of submarines is usually classified, and it is very rare for a President to mention them directly like this." He said, "Submarines are hard-to-track weapon systems, so they hold significant strategic value," adding, "This action is part of a psychological operation subtly reminding the adversary of U.S. military capabilities."

Some analysts suggest that the U.S. may not have actually dispatched new submarines but rather adjusted the operational scope of existing ones. Mark Cancian, a senior advisor at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), stated, "The U.S. military always operates about ten strategic submarines, and this redeployment might be an internal military operational shift."

There are interpretations that behind President Trump's unusual mention of the presence of strategic assets lies a diplomatic message. As negotiations to end the war in Ukraine stall and Russia delays signing a peace agreement, the analysis posits that the U.S. aims to increase military pressure in hopes of bringing Russia back to the negotiating table.

Brian Clark, Director of the Defense Center at the Hudson Institute, said, "President Trump is attempting to maximize the deterrent effect in response to Russia's repeated nuclear threats," emphasizing, "The mere public mention of the submarine's presence constitutes strategic pressure."

On the other hand, there are concerns that such public measures could provoke unnecessary tensions. Military expert Matthew Shoemaker warned, "Submarines are fundamentally covert forces, and mentioning them tends to have more political messaging than operational objectives," cautioning that, with both sides showcasing military power, the possibility of accidental clashes exists.

The U.S. has previously responded in a similar manner to Russia's military movements. Last year, when Russia moved its warships near Cuba, the U.S. military issued a warning by surfacing submarines in Guantanamo Bay.

Military experts noted that this action is "not just a simple military operation but a strong diplomatic message to Russia, which could serve as an important turning point for future U.S.-Russia relations."

※ This article has been translated by AI. Share your feedback here.