The picture-perfect couple Cho Gap-kyung and Hong Seo-beom have been tripped up by controversy over their son's private life. Moreover, in Cho Gap-kyung's case, a preview for her appearance on Radio Star has already been released. Voices of concern are growing about criticism extending even to the parents, who are not the parties involved.
The controversy erupted during the divorce proceedings between Cho Gap-kyung's son, a person surnamed A, and his ex-wife, a person surnamed B. B raised suspicions through the YouTube channel (Garosero Research Institute) of A's affair and failure to pay child support. The court reportedly partly held A responsible and ordered him to pay 30 million won in consolation money and 800,000 won per month in child support. However, since an appeal is currently underway, both sides' positions remain at odds.
In this process, although A is not a celebrity, public opinion has formed that holds the parents, Hong Seo-beom and Cho Gap-kyung, responsible as well, expanding the controversy. The two had previously expressed cautious positions at their son's wedding, saying it was the private life of an ordinary person. For that reason, it is notable that they have refrained from direct involvement in this matter as well.
In particular, Hong Seo-beom drew a line, saying "this is an issue for adults, so it is not a realm to interfere in," and Cho Gap-kyung likewise conveyed a cautious stance, saying "it has not been fully sorted out yet." They also said they had provided some consolation money but were waiting for the outcome of the appeals trial regarding child support before responding.
The problem is that the two parents' activities also appear to be hampered. Currently, attention is focused on a preview released for Cho Gap-kyung's appearance on Radio Star. Cho Gap-kyung appears as a guest in the next-week preview shown at the end of Choi Gon's Radio Star broadcast, and coincidentally this controversy is causing repercussions.
Regarding Cho Gap-kyung's appearance, Radio Star said it is "looking into the details" and will announce its position after confirmation. With voices saying it is excessive to extend matters of an adult child's private life to the parents, and given that A is not a celebrity, concerns are also being raised that excessive interest and criticism directed at the whole family could lead to another form of secondary harm.
Ultimately, this controversy again raises the question of where to draw the line on an individual's private life. Attention is focused on how the controversy will be resolved going forward and on whether the broadcast will air or be edited.
[Photo] Broadcast screen
[OSEN]