'The dispute between broadcaster Park Narae and her former manager is unfolding in a "one reversal a day" pattern amid successive tape releases and conflicting explanations. Each time a position is released, new recordings and testimony emerge, and the controversy appears to be gradually moving into the realm of legal adjudication.
The controversy began with a call recording released in December last year. The recording captured Park Narae and former manager Mr. A talking on the phone in the early morning hours, and Mr. A sobbed from the start of the call, saying, "I don't know how it came to this," and "I didn't want it to go this far." Park Narae comforted Mr. A and suggested meeting, and after the two actually met and spoke, Park Narae issued a statement to the effect that "misunderstandings with the former managers were resolved."
But a reversal followed immediately. Mr. A refuted Park Narae's position, saying, "There was no substantive apology or agreement; it was just an emotional conversation," and drew a line on the reportedly alleged "demand for a 500 million won settlement," saying, "That is not true."
The situation then reversed again. In additional released recordings and third-party testimony, the amount "500 million won" was repeatedly mentioned, bringing the controversy into a new phase. A recording of a person who had mediated contained a remark to the effect of, "I demanded a total of 500 million won, including 250 million won related to unpaid wages and other matters," and another entertainment writer reportedly conveyed the position that "the amount Mr. A wants is 500 million."
In response, Mr. A again denied it, saying, "I did not directly demand 500 million that early morning," but the focus of the dispute is gradually shifting from "whether those words were spoken that day" to "how the intent to demand was conveyed." Even if there were no direct statements, if repeated transmission through third parties occurred, interpretations differ on how to read that.
The controversy became even more complicated with claims surrounding the theft at Park Narae's home, valued at around 5.5 billion won. Conflicting explanations continue over who first raised suspicions of an insider act, and whether the submission of personal information and cooperation with the police were appropriate. That the lawyer retained at the time of the theft and the legal representative currently handling the dispute are the same person has also emerged as another point of contention.
Thus, the controversy has expanded beyond a simple emotional clash into a complex dispute entangling whether money was demanded and how it was conveyed, the mediation process and legal interests. The more explanations come out, the more questions arise, and the more rebuttals follow, the more reversals appear.
One thing is clear amid the conflicting claims: it is difficult to determine the truth of the matter based solely on the recordings and testimony currently disclosed. Observers say the substance of this controversy is likely to be resolved through legal adjudication rather than public opinion.
The Park Narae controversy continues in a "one reversal a day" pattern. The puzzle is becoming increasingly complex, and attention is on whether the answer will be revealed in court.<
[photo] SNS'
[OSEN]